What it tells you
The score and band
A score from 0 to 100 for how likely the field is to be built on, and its band: Low (0 to 19), Moderate (20 to 44), High (45 to 69) or Very high (70 to 100).
The outlook
How the field looks over the next 5 years and the next 15 years.
The planning process
Where the field is in the planning process: interest, put forward, in the Local Plan, application, permission, building.
The strongest reasons
The strongest reasons behind the score, in general terms, and how many push it up or down.
The planning process
The report shows six stages a field can go through on its way to being built on:- Interest: a promoter or housebuilder takes an interest in the land.
- Put forward: the land is offered to the council for development.
- In the Local Plan: the council allocates it for housing.
- Application: someone applies for planning permission.
- Permission: the council, or an inspector, grants permission.
- Building: homes are built.
Confidence
The report says how confident the score is: high, medium or low. Low confidence means we don’t yet hold the council’s Local Plan sites or its planning applications for that area. Those are where the strongest signs of development come from, so without them the score may be missing something. The report says which checks it couldn’t make. The Data and sources tab lists every check (protected sites, flood zones, Green Belt, farmland quality, closeness to a town or village, road access, services, Local Plan sites, planning applications, the council’s housing supply, rights of way, and the web check) and whether it was made, along with the datasets behind the report and their licences.What’s in the deep report instead
These tabs are locked in the free report:- Why this score: every reason, with its source
- On the web: what the web check found (the free report says how many)
- Planning nearby: planning applications within 1 km
- What could change: what could move the score